No. POSSIBLY “the big two”, but it is considering letting Chrysler go under an option that’s off the table in an industry that has far too much (US) car capacity? Who says there has to be 3? They sell cars at a LOSS! They need to build less numbers of better cars and make a profit doing it. I have an idea where they can get some money for them, end the ridiculous ethanol subsidy and Brazilian ethanol tariff. Better yet, end ethanol, a policy parsecs beyond stupid.

These two fundamental errors are
1. this is really a pathetically childish game between two political elites, Administration and Congress, who feel that they, and in fact do, own the country to see who blinks first. This is especially true on the part of Congress, which in the course of the past 8 years were treated, and were, less than worms before the Administration, and did every single order, regardless, and worse than any whore ever did. For all we, the people, or the Big 3, are concerned, Congress can today pass a law giving $25b to them.
Because in this naked robbery Paulson and his gangster buddies are right: they gave these Congress people $150b in bribe to be able to steal this $700b. You musk know the money was $850b and NOT $700b. So Paulson is saying, you already had your cut. So if you want $25b go give from your own cut or pass another bill. Which means, none of these people even have a speck of the thieves’ honor of the past.

2. The second error is that, why on earth – and this repeated often by so many people who are supposed to be well informed, keep pushing the “bad apple” theory. It was NOT Paulson, it was NOT Bush or Cheney, but the entire ruling class, both its Democratic faction and Republican faction were in all these unrivalled acts of robbery, murder, genocide, law-breaking, torture, spying, you name it together.
You know where I am going,

Peace,